_______________________________________________Hi all,short info - we have two ASNs running JunOS 19.4. Even Juniper officially supports RFC 8950 from 17.3R1 on MX and 20.1R1 on QFX (https://lists.ix-f.net/hyperkitty/list/rfc8950@lists.euro-ix.net/message/GV2M2UQTY2BP5C25YJAXABRVSBBX3BNP/) those networks are struggling to get RFC8950 enabled.Juniper announces "enhanced next-hop" capability, however receiving an IPv4 prefix with two next-hops (local-link and global) will tear down the BGP session. The logged message says "bad nhop len: 32 for afi 1, safi 1" - clearly not expecting two next-hops. I do not have any Juniper to test with and this sounds like an incompatibility with RFC 8950 where both next-hops are expected as per:What are your thoughts on a problem like this?Marian--Marian RychteckýNIX.CZ, z.s.p.o.Mahlerovy sady 2699/1130 00 Praha 3Česká republika / Czech Republic
Rfc8950 mailing list -- rfc8950@lists.euro-ix.net
To unsubscribe send an email to rfc8950-leave@lists.euro-ix.net
BCIX Management GmbH
Albrechtstr. 110
12103 Berlin
Germany
Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors: Jens Lietzmann, André Grüneberg
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 143581 B