[Rfc8950] Re: RFC8950 with Juniper issue

The referenced post with quotes from Juniper SE was stating that they had RFC5549 support implemented in 17.3R1. RFC5549 already contains the statement about next hop length 32 octets. I do have an MX204 running JunOS 21.4R3 having a RFC8950 peering session up with an FRR. Considering that this issue has been reported by FRR community before ( https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/6433), I believe we are receiving 32 octet next_hop (I don't know how to verify though).