21 Feb
2025
21 Feb
'25
8:31 a.m.
Thank you for your response, no problem we will test it. We have two
ASNs with the exact same problem.
I'll keep you informed.
Marian
--
Marian Rychtecký
NIX.CZ, z.s.p.o.
Mahlerovy sady 2699/1
130 00 Praha 3
Česká republika / Czech Republic
------ Original Message ------
From "André Grüneberg" <andre.grueneberg(a)bcix.de>
To "Job Snijders" <job(a)openbsd.org>
Cc "Marian Rychtecky" <mr(a)nix.cz>cz>; rfc8950(a)lists.euro-ix.net
Date 21-Feb-25 8:37:09
Subject Re: [Rfc8950] Re: RFC8950 with Juniper issue
Hi Job,
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 at 08:16, Job Snijders <job(a)openbsd.org> wrote:
Well, that's the point ... I am not confident I can/want to do that on
a MX204 with relevant production traffic on it.
I feel, it'd be easier to replicate in containerlab with vJunosSwitch
(or vJunosRouter FWIW), but this is only available from JunOS 23.1 :/
I'd reconsider if some Juniper pro told me how to limit pcap to BGP
with one IPv6 address.
André
--
André Grüneberg, Managing Director
andre.grueneberg(a)bcix.de
+49 30 2332195 42
BCIX Management GmbH
Albrechtstr. 110
12103 Berlin
Germany
Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors: Jens Lietzmann, André Grüneberg
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 143581 B
Considering that this issue has been reported by FRR community
before (
https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues/6433), I
believe we are
receiving
32 octet next_hop (I don't know how to verify
though).
Can you capture a PCAP using wireshark or tcpdump?